Saul Greenberg

back to The Thesis Oral

Hints for PhD Defenses
by Ed Coffman, Jonathan Rosenberg and Sal Stolfo

This page was reformatted from the text originally available at

At Columbia, PhD defenses are generally not public, although CS usually allows a student audience. Defenses consist of four parts: first, the candidate introduces themselves, then presents a summary of their work, interrupted and followed by questions from the committee. Finally, the committee meets in private to discuss the presentation and dissertation.

While most of the committee will have read most of your thesis, you cannot assume that everyone has read every chapter.

The committee needs to be able to assess impact and depth. Usually, the committee has some idea of this before the defense, but whatever the student can say to make this assessment easier, perhaps just through emphasis, is likely to make the defense go much more smoothly.

Generally, the whole defense will not take more than two hours, but should take considerably less time. Part of the challenge of a defense is to convince the committee that you can summarize the important points of your work in a very limited time.

  • Your presentation (and thesis) needs to address the following:
    • What is the problem you are studying?
    • Why is it important?
    • What results have you achieved?
  • Some committee members will want to know if the works has been published and where and how it was received. For example, if you have written software, indicate where it is being used, either for follow-on work or in some production or test environment.
  • Have a list of your thesis-related publications as a slide. Indicate any awards that a paper may have received. For most people, it's easier to list some honor than "brag" about it in person.
  • If you have presented your work in a conference or at job talks, be sure to anticipate and address the most common questions asked there.
  • It's a nice gesture to provide snacks for the defense (coffee, bagels, cookies, fruit, etc.).
  • The committee should be handed a copy of your slides.
  • Be prepared to briefly summarize your background (undergraduate degree, how long at the university, etc.)
  • No more than 30 slides, plus "back up" slides with additional material in case of questions. The most effective way of making your committee members mad is to come unprepared with a stack of 80 slides and then madly skip through them.
  • Number your slides, particularly if one of your committee members is linked in via speakerphone. Consider using some kind of remote presentation software.
  • List your contributions early.
  • When presenting your contributions, be sure to use "I" and not "we" so that the committee will know what aspects of the work where yours, and which were group projects.
  • Keep discussions of related work very brief, but be prepared to answer questions of the "how does this differ from so-and-so's work" succinctly.
  • You will not be asked to prove results again.
  • Be prepared to back up any comparative statement with facts, in particular statements like "works better", "faster", "scalable" or "optimal". If you are presenting a protocol, how do you know that it works correctly?
  • If you have multiple parts in your dissertation, consult with the committee ahead of time as to whether it makes sense to omit some of them for the presentation.

Hints for Dissertations

  • It is better to focus deeply on a single area then to work on several topics, each of which is pursued to a moderate depth.
  • Systems work must be coupled with implementation and some kind of numerical comparitive analysis to demonstrate the improvements from existing or alternate approaches.
  • Your thesis needs a one page executive summary that a layperson should be able to understand. Test: give it to a relative of yours that does not have an engineering degree...

Checklist for Dissertation

Before you submit your draft to the committee, be sure to verify that you have done the following checks:

  • Spell check;
  • Check for missing chapter or figure references;
  • Section, Chapter, Figure are capitalized;
  • All references converted from [1][2][3] to [1,2,3];
  • Consistent capitalization in captions;
  • Verify expansion of all abbreviations at first instance;
  • Avoid "tremendous", "huge" and other similar adjectives;
  • End to end -> end-to-end;
  • Check references for capitalization of abbreviations and missing data such as page numbers.

(Contributions by Ed Coffman, Jonathan Rosenberg and Sal Stolfo.) This version was last updated 04/16/2010 19:20:15 by Henning Schulzrinne